- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs Galaxy M53
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (3) and where Galaxy M53 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display6.8
4.7Performance5.4
7.5Camera7.6
5.3Battery5.3
7.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GGalaxy M53
| Galaxy M52 5G | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.7 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 173 g | 176 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Galaxy M53?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,796 vs 2,449+14%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme679 vs 609+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- AnTuTu score504,424 vs 680,628+35%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Measured brightness777 nits vs 802 nits+3%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 44%+47%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Loudspeaker loudness-30 LUFS vs -29.3 LUFS+-2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | One UI 5.1 |
