- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M31 vs Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M31 vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What Galaxy M31 does better (4) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display6.8
3.0Performance4.7
7.5Camera7.5
6.6Battery5.3
5.0Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M31Galaxy M52 5G
| Galaxy M31 | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.2 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M31 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
- Peak brightness420 nits vs 400 nits+5%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 393 ppi+3%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Galaxy M31?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,023 vs 2,7962.7×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- AnTuTu score326,489 vs 504,424+54%
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- 5GNo · Galaxy M31: Yes
- Measured brightness611 nits vs 777 nits+27%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight191 g vs 173 g+10%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Process10 nm vs 6 nm+67%
- Charged in 30 min22% vs 30%+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Space Black, Red | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 611 nits | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9611 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 326,489 | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,023 | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 22% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | One UI 5.1 |
