- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs iQOO Neo5 Lite
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (10) and where iQOO Neo5 Lite wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.3
7.5Camera6.5
5.3Battery4.8
7.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GiQOO Neo5 Lite
| Galaxy M52 5G | iQOO Neo5 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 198 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than iQOO Neo5 Lite?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Weight173 g vs 198 g+15%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+20%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 84%+3%
Why is iQOO Neo5 Lite better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 64%2.1×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 402 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 84% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | OriginOS 1.0 |
