- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs Camon 17 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Tecno Camon 17 Pro
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (14) and where Camon 17 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.4
4.7Performance2.9
7.5Camera7.6
5.3Battery6.0
7.9Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GCamon 17 Pro
| Galaxy M52 5G | Camon 17 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.9 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 201 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Camon 17 Pro?
- AnTuTu score504,424 vs 309,107+63%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,796 vs 1,668+68%
- OLED panelYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Measured brightness777 nits vs 538 nits+44%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
- Weight173 g vs 201 g+16%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 9 mm+22%
Why is Camon 17 Pro better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 48 MP+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-30 LUFS vs -24.4 LUFS+-19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | 538 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | 309,107 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | 1,668 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 48 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | -24.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | HiOS 7.6 |
