- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A51 5G vs Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
What Galaxy A51 5G does better (8) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro Max wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display3.9
6.8Camera7.5
2.9Battery7.1
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A51 5GRedmi Note 9 Pro Max
| Galaxy A51 5G | Redmi Note 9 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 165.5 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.7 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 209 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A51 5G better than Redmi Note 9 Pro Max?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro Max: No
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro Max: No
- NFCYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro Max: No
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro Max: No
- Weight187 g vs 209 g+12%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.2% vs 84.6%+3%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro Max better than Galaxy A51 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+12%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 450 nits+12%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 50%+67%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube White, Prism Cube Pink | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 642 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 980 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 316,007 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,867 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 13 |
