- android.gs
- Compare
- P40 lite vs Galaxy A51 5G
Huawei P40 lite vs Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
What P40 lite does better (10) and where Galaxy A51 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display5.0
4.8Performance3.2
6.0Camera6.8
3.9Battery2.9
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
P40 liteGalaxy A51 5G
| P40 lite | Galaxy A51 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 158.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.7 mm | = |
| Weight | 183 g | 187 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P40 lite better than Galaxy A51 5G?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,846 vs 1,8674.2×
- Wired charging40 W vs 15 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score325,777 vs 316,007+3%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 30%2.3×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 400 nits+12%
- CPU frequency2.27 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+3%
- Weight183 g vs 187 g+2%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
- Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS vs -29.5 LUFS+-8%
Why is Galaxy A51 5G better than P40 lite?
- OLED panelNo · P40 lite: Yes
- 5GNo · P40 lite: Yes
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Measured brightness515 nits vs 642 nits+25%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · P40 lite: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 87.2%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Emerald Green, Light Pink/Blue, Skyline Gray | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube White, Prism Cube Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,310 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 515 nits | 642 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 87.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 810 | Exynos 980 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Exynos |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.27 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-G76 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 325,777 | 316,007 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,846 | 1,867 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 382 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | -29.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.5 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | One UI 5 |
