- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (5) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.7
7.8Camera7.3
5.3Battery7.2
5.7Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GRedmi Note 12 Pro 4G
| Galaxy A24 4G | Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 202 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: No
- Weight195 g vs 202 g+3%
- Process6 nm vs 8 nm+33%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,100 nits+10%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 86%+4%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.1 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 86% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
