- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 30 Pro vs Galaxy A24 4G
Infinix Note 30 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Note 30 Pro does better (13) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.0
4.4Performance3.7
6.6Camera7.8
7.6Battery5.3
4.1Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 30 ProGalaxy A24 4G
| Note 30 Pro | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 195 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 30 Pro better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score562,269 vs 398,005+41%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,975 vs 1,890+4%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 46%+74%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 82.4%+5%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Note 30 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 30 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 30 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,000 nits+11%
- Weight203 g vs 195 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Magic Black, Variable Gold | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,269 | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 46% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
