- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Redmi 12
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi 12
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (12) and where Redmi 12 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.6
3.7Performance2.5
7.8Camera5.8
5.3Battery4.6
5.7Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GRedmi 12
| Galaxy A24 4G | Redmi 12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 168.6 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.3 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 198 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Redmi 12?
- AnTuTu score398,005 vs 258,006+54%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 12: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi 12: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,890 vs 1,303+45%
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Measured brightness1,012 nits vs 541 nits+87%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 550 nits+82%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Charged in 30 min46% vs 29%+59%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.9 LUFS vs -29.9 LUFS+-3%
Why is Redmi 12 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 85.1%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Midnight Black, Sky Blue, Polar Silver, Moonstone Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | 541 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 85.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | 258,006 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | 1,303 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | 29% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | -29.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
