- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Power Armor X11
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs UleFone Power Armor X11
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (20) and where Power Armor X11 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display2.8
7.8Camera3.1
5.3Battery9.3
5.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GPower Armor X11
| Galaxy A24 4G | Power Armor X11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.2 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 19.3 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 330 g | −135 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Power Armor X11?
- Main camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Weight195 g vs 330 g+69%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 19.3 mm2.3×
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 295 ppi+34%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Why is Power Armor X11 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 8,150 mAh+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 330 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 19.3 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 5.4″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 63.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 8,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
