- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Pova Neo 3
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Tecno Pova Neo 3
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (17) and where Pova Neo 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.0
3.7Performance2.8
7.8Camera3.7
5.3Battery7.6
5.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GPova Neo 3
| Galaxy A24 4G | Pova Neo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 170.7 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.6 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.3 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 201 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Pova Neo 3?
- Main camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- AnTuTu score398,005 vs 323,764+23%
- OLED panelYes · Pova Neo 3: No
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 500 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Neo 3: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,890 vs 1,459+30%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 263 ppi+51%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Neo 3: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Pova Neo 3 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- 5GNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 170.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Amber Gold, Mecha Black, Hurricane Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 83.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | 323,764 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | 1,459 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
