- android.gs
- Compare
- MC02 vs X200
Punkt. MC02 vs Vivo X200
What MC02 does better (3) and where X200 wins (20) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MC02X200
| MC02 | X200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.9 mm | 160.3 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 74.8 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 10.9 mm | 8 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 230 g | 197 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MC02 better than X200?
- Wireless chargingYes · X200: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · X200: No
Why is X200 better than MC02?
- RAM6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Wired charging18 W vs 90 W5×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 4,500 nits11.2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
- OLED panelNo · MC02: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · MC02: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · MC02: Yes
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+5%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+51%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · MC02: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 230 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 10.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.9 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Black | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,563 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G68 MC4 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,632,874 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,334 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 24 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Apostrophy OS | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
