- android.gs
- Compare
- WP62 vs Camon 40
Oukitel WP62 vs Tecno Camon 40
What WP62 does better (9) and where Camon 40 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP62Camon 40
| WP62 | Camon 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.1 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.6 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Thickness | 15.3 mm | 7.3 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 364 g | 177 g | +187 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP62 better than Camon 40?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh2.1×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 40: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 40 better than WP62?
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,300 nits2.9×
- Weight364 g vs 177 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · WP62: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP62: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP62: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Thickness15.3 mm vs 7.3 mm2.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · WP62: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio75.2% vs 89.8%+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 364 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 15.3 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Boe glass | Panda King Glass |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.2% | 89.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 575,113 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 120 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
