- android.gs
- Compare
- Tiger 10 vs Galaxy A24 4G
OSCAL Tiger 10 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Tiger 10 does better (4) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display7.0
4.6Camera7.8
7.7Battery5.3
3.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tiger 10Galaxy A24 4G
| Tiger 10 | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 162.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77.6 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tiger 10 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,180 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen-to-body ratio85.3% vs 82.4%+4%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Tiger 10?
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Tiger 10: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Tiger 10: Yes
- NFCNo · Tiger 10: Yes
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 396 ppi+48%
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Tiger 10: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Dim Forest Green, Summer Sky Blue, Stardust Grey | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,180 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
