- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno8 T vs Phantom X2
OPPO Reno8 T vs Tecno Phantom X2
What Reno8 T does better (7) and where Phantom X2 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display8.6
4.2Performance7.0
6.6Camera9.2
6.0Battery7.8
6.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno8 TPhantom X2
| Reno8 T | Phantom X2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.8 mm | 164.6 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 72.7 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 203 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno8 T better than Phantom X2?
- Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2: No
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom X2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Phantom X2: No
- Weight180 g vs 203 g+13%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 387 ppi+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.9 mm+14%
Why is Phantom X2 better than Reno8 T?
- AnTuTu score534,715 vs 973,623+82%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,978 vs 4,0272×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno8 T: Yes
- 5GNo · Reno8 T: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+39%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Reno8 T: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 160.8 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 710 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 93.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | 534,715 | 973,623 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,978 | 4,027 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 378 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | HiOS 8.6 |
