- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno7 Lite vs Pova 4
OPPO Reno7 Lite vs Tecno Pova 4
What Reno7 Lite does better (15) and where Pova 4 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display4.4
3.5Performance4.0
6.1Camera4.6
4.2Battery7.0
6.2Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno7 LitePova 4
| Reno7 Lite | Pova 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 170.6 mm | −10.7 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 77.5 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.7 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 214 g | −41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno7 Lite better than Pova 4?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Pova 4: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GYes · Pova 4: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,996 vs 1,640+22%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 257 ppi+59%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 25%2.5×
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Weight173 g vs 214 g+24%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Pova 4 better than Reno7 Lite?
- AnTuTu score315,250 vs 540,584+71%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno7 Lite: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 257 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 657 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 315,250 | 540,584 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,996 | 1,640 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 343 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 12 | HiOS 12 |
