- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno16 Pro (China) vs Galaxy S25 Ultra
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What Reno16 Pro (China) does better (8) and where Galaxy S25 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.1
9.3Performance9.1
9.7Camera9.8
9.6Battery7.1
9.3Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno16 Pro (China)Galaxy S25 Ultra
| Reno16 Pro (China) | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 162.8 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno16 Pro (China) better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+40%
- AnTuTu score3,079,298 vs 2,207,809+39%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 15 W3.3×
- Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 2,600 nits+38%
- Weight205 g vs 218 g+6%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+6%
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Reno16 Pro (China)?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,359 vs 9,846+18%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Reno16 Pro (China): Yes
- CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+20%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 498 ppi+11%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,440 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Titanium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 498 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,417 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 92.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC11 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,079,298 | 2,207,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,359 | 9,846 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,687 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 45 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vsHonor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7