- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro (China) vs Phantom X2
OPPO Reno11 Pro (China) vs Tecno Phantom X2
What Reno11 Pro (China) does better (12) and where Phantom X2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display8.6
8.8Camera9.2
6.4Battery7.8
7.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 Pro (China)Phantom X2
| Reno11 Pro (China) | Phantom X2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 164.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 72.7 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 203 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro (China) better than Phantom X2?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Phantom X2: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom X2: No
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 387 ppi+17%
- Weight190 g vs 203 g+7%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 81%+68%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,080 px+15%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
Why is Phantom X2 better than Reno11 Pro (China)?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+10%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.3% vs 93.3%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Green, Silver | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 710 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 973,623 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,027 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | HiOS 8.6 |
