- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 F vs Poco M6 Pro 4G
OPPO Reno11 F vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
What Reno11 F does better (10) and where Poco M6 Pro 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display8.2
5.7Performance3.8
7.5Camera8.3
7.2Battery5.3
7.3Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 FPoco M6 Pro 4G
| Reno11 F | Poco M6 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm | = |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 F better than Poco M6 Pro 4G?
- AnTuTu score841,497 vs 386,3012.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,398 vs 1,892+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M6 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8 mm+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Poco M6 Pro 4G better than Reno11 F?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno11 F: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno11 F: Yes
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,300 nits+18%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 68%+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,053 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 841,497 | 386,301 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,398 | 1,892 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | MIUI 14 |
