- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 F vs Camon 30 5G
OPPO Reno11 F vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
What Reno11 F does better (14) and where Camon 30 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display8.6
5.7Performance5.6
7.5Camera8.0
7.2Battery7.3
7.3Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 FCamon 30 5G
| Reno11 F | Camon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 165.4 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 199 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 F better than Camon 30 5G?
- AnTuTu score841,497 vs 723,262+16%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,398 vs 2,311+4%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Weight177 g vs 199 g+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Camon 30 5G better than Reno11 F?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno11 F: Yes
- Wired charging67 W vs 70 W+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 67%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda glass | — |
| Colours | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Emerald Lake Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 841,497 | 723,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,398 | 2,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
