android.gs
Compare
Reno11 F vs X200 Pro mini

OPPO Reno11 F vs Vivo X200 Pro mini

What Reno11 F does better (5) and where X200 Pro mini wins (21) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2024Reno11 F

8.0Score

5 advantages≈ $620

Vivo · 2024X200 Pro mini

9.5Score

21 advantages≈ $660

Higher score

7.7Display8.2

5.7Performance9.2

7.5Camera9.3

7.2Battery9.1

7.3Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno11 FX200 Pro mini

	Reno11 F	X200 Pro mini	Difference
Height	161.1 mm	150.8 mm	+10.3 mm
Width	74.7 mm	71.8 mm	+2.9 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.2 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	177 g	187 g	−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno11 F better than X200 Pro mini?

Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Memory card slotYes · X200 Pro mini: No
Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Weight177 g vs 187 g+6%
Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%

Why is X200 Pro mini better than Reno11 F?

AnTuTu score841,497 vs 2,779,1293.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,398 vs 8,7053.6×
RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 4,500 nits4.1×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Optical stabilisationNo · Reno11 F: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Reno11 F: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Reno11 F: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Reno11 F: Yes
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+14%
Wired charging67 W vs 90 W+34%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno11 F≈ $6208.0	Vivo X200 Pro mini≈ $6609.5
Design
Weight	177 g	187 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.2 mm
Height	161.1 mm	150.8 mm
Width	74.7 mm	71.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	—
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	Panda glass	—
Colours	Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple	Black, White, Green, Pink
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.3″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,216 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,100 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,805 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.8%	90.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7050	Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	841,497	2,779,129
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,398	8,705
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,665
Memory
RAM	8 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/2.0"	1/1.28"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Wired charging	67 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	62%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	OriginOS 5 (China)