How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno11 F vs X100 Ultra

OPPO Reno11 F vs Vivo X100 Ultra

What Reno11 F does better (5) and where X100 Ultra wins (23) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno11 F
OPPO · 2024Reno11 F
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $620
vs
Vivo X100 Ultra
Vivo · 2024X100 Ultra
9.5Score
23 advantages≈ $660
Higher score
7.7Display9.0
5.7Performance8.7
7.5Camera9.7
7.2Battery7.8
7.3Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno11 FX100 Ultra
74.7 × 161.17.575.6 × 164.19.2
Reno11 FX100 UltraDifference
Height161.1 mm164.1 mm−3 mm
Width74.7 mm75.6 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness7.5 mm9.2 mm−1.7 mm
Weight177 g229 g−52 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno11 F better than X100 Ultra?

  1. Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
  2. Weight177 g vs 229 g+29%
  3. Memory card slotYes · X100 Ultra: No
  4. Thickness7.5 mm vs 9.2 mm+23%
  5. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is X100 Ultra better than Reno11 F?

  1. AnTuTu score841,497 vs 2,152,7902.6×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,398 vs 6,3112.6×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  4. Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 3,000 nits2.7×
  5. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  6. Optical stabilisationNo · Reno11 F: Yes
  7. Telephoto cameraNo · Reno11 F: Yes
  8. Wireless chargingNo · Reno11 F: Yes
  9. Stereo speakersNo · Reno11 F: Yes
  10. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
  11. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx9+80%
  12. Wired charging67 W vs 80 W+19%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno11 FOPPO Reno11 F≈ $6208.0
Vivo X100 UltraVivo X100 Ultra≈ $6609.5
Design
Weight177 g229 g
Thickness7.5 mm9.2 mm
Height161.1 mm164.1 mm
Width74.7 mm75.6 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP65IP69
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx9
Glass protectionPanda glass—
ColoursPalm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral PurpleTitanium, White, Grey
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,412 px3,200 px
Pixel density394 ppi517 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,100 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,801 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.8%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 750
AnTuTu score841,4972,152,790
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,3986,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,934
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera64 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/0.98"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—12.9 h
Wired charging67 W80 W
Charged in 30 min62%65%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—30 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15OriginOS 5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare