- android.gs
- Compare
- K9s vs Galaxy M52 5G
OPPO K9s vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What K9s does better (6) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display6.8
7.2Camera7.5
5.5Battery5.3
5.8Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
K9sGalaxy M52 5G
| K9s | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 173 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K9s better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than K9s?
- OLED panelNo · K9s: Yes
- NFCNo · K9s: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · K9s: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 173 g+15%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.4 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.7% vs 86.4%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Aurora | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.2 | One UI 5.1 |
