- android.gs
- Compare
- Z60 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9 Pro
nubia Z60 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
What Z60 Ultra does better (10) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
8.7Display9.4
9.2Camera8.9
8.9Battery8.6
9.3Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Z60 UltraiQOO Neo9 Pro
| Z60 Ultra | iQOO Neo9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.7 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 246 g | 190 g | +56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Z60 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+16%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Z60 Ultra?
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 3,000 nits2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight246 g vs 190 g+29%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 453 ppi+13%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Resolution (width)1,116 px vs 1,260 px+13%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 246 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | 4 warianty, Star, 4 warianty, Galaxy, 4 warianty, Starry Sky Collector's Edition | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,116 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,386,903 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,445 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.3× | — |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, color spectrum, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MyOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
