How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9 Pro vs 14 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra

What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (7) and where 14 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
7 advantages
vs
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Xiaomi · 202414 Ultra
9.3Score
16 advantages≈ $710
Higher score
9.4Display8.9
8.6Performance8.8
8.9Camera9.8
8.6Battery6.8
7.7Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9 Pro14 Ultra
75.7 × 163.5875.3 × 161.49.2
iQOO Neo9 Pro14 UltraDifference
Height163.5 mm161.4 mm+2.1 mm
Width75.7 mm75.3 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness8 mm9.2 mm−1.2 mm
Weight190 g230 g−40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than 14 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,386,903 vs 2,014,262+19%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  3. Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  5. Weight190 g vs 230 g+21%
  6. Charged in 30 min136% vs 91%+49%
  7. Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%

Why is 14 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
  4. Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
  5. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,445 vs 7,060+30%
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. Rear cameras2 vs 42×
  9. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  10. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  11. 4K selfie videoNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
  12. Pixel density453 ppi vs 522 ppi+15%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 14 UltraXiaomi 14 Ultra≈ $7109.3
Design
Weight190 g230 g
Thickness8 mm9.2 mm
Height163.5 mm161.4 mm
Width75.7 mm75.3 mm
FramePlasticTitanium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP54IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation UpXiaomi Shield Glass
ColoursFiery Red, Conqueror BlackBlack, Blue, White, Titanium Gray
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density453 ppi522 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,281 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%89.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,386,9032,014,262
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,4457,060
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,977
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.49"1"
Rear cameras24
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,160 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—11.4 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min136%91%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—80 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 14HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare