- android.gs
- Compare
- Flip vs Phantom V Fold2
nubia Flip vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
What Flip does better (2) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display6.3
3.1Camera5.8
3.8Battery7.0
3.3Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlipPhantom V Fold2
| Flip | Phantom V Fold2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 159 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 140.4 mm | −64.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 6.1 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 249 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flip better than Phantom V Fold2?
- Weight214 g vs 249 g+16%
- Pixel density439 ppi vs 388 ppi+13%
Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Flip?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Flip: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Flip: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Flip: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Flip: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 6.1 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 140.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Sunshine Golden, Cosmic Black | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,188 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,790 px | 2,296 px |
| Pixel density | 439 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 573 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 88.2% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,158,040 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,327 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,559 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 5,750 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 9.6 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 14 Fold |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
