- android.gs
- Compare
- XR21 vs Camon 20 Pro
Nokia XR21 vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What XR21 does better (9) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display7.2
4.1Performance4.4
6.6Camera6.4
4.3Battery6.0
8.5Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
XR21Camon 20 Pro
| XR21 | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 163.4 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 76.7 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Weight | 231 g | 190 g | +41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XR21 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- 5GYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,111 vs 1,953+8%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Peak brightness550 nits vs 500 nits+10%
- Pixel density406 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than XR21?
- OLED panelNo · XR21: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Weight231 g vs 190 g+22%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+35%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 38%+27%
- Screen-to-body ratio77% vs 85.7%+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 231 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Pine Green | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 406 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 487 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 567,090 | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,111 | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
