How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 60 Ultra vs nubia Flip2

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Flip2

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (22) and where nubia Flip2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
22 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Flip2
ZTE · 2025nubia Flip2
5.2Score
3 advantages
9.6Display4.9
6.6Camera3.5
8.4Battery4.0
8.4Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 Ultranubia Flip2
74 × 171.57.276 × 1707.2
Razr 60 Ultranubia Flip2Difference
Height171.5 mm170 mm+1.5 mm
Width74 mm76 mm−2 mm
Thickness7.2 mm7.2 mm=
Weight199 g193 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than nubia Flip2?

  1. Wired charging68 W vs 33 W2.1×
  2. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits3.8×
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Flip2: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · nubia Flip2: No
  6. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  7. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  8. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,325 mAh+9%
  9. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+73%
  10. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  12. Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Flip2: No

Why is nubia Flip2 better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Drop resistance classD vs C
  2. Weight199 g vs 193 g+3%
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g193 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.2 mm
Height171.5 mm170 mm
Width74 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-Keramik—
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretNight Black, Lilac Purple, Blue, White
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,188 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,790 px
Pixel density464 ppi443 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,200 nits
Measured brightness1,489 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%84.2%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteMediatek Dimensity 7300X
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score1,831,189—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"—
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,325 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)15.2 h—
Wired charging68 W33 W
Charged in 30 min78%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version2—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UI—
EU label
Energy classAC
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle49 h37 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classDC
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare