How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (27) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1Score
27 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2Score
6 advantages≈ $530
9.6Display5.8
8.4Performance6.1
6.6Camera4.0
8.4Battery3.0
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Flip7 FE
74 × 171.57.271.9 × 165.16.9
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Flip7 FEDifference
Height171.5 mm165.1 mm+6.4 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness7.2 mm6.9 mm+0.3 mm
Weight199 g187 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

  1. Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
  2. RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  4. AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,355,845+35%
  5. Active use (test)15.2 h vs 10.2 h+49%
  6. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
  7. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  8. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
  9. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 4,036+47%
  10. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 6,108+11%
  11. Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
  12. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Razr 60 Ultra?

  1. Drop resistance classD vs A
  2. Weight199 g vs 187 g+6%
  3. Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 1,700+70%
  4. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  5. CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
  6. Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.9 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g187 g
Thickness7.2 mm6.9 mm
Height171.5 mm165.1 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-KeramikGorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlack, White
Display
Screen size7″6.7″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,640 px
Pixel density464 ppi426 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness1,489 nits1,444 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%85.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteExynos 2400
Chip makerQualcommExynos
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score1,831,1891,355,845
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,7966,108
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,9384,036
Memory
RAM16 GB8 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom2×2×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h10.2 h
Wired charging68 W25 W
Charged in 30 min78%50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS-26.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.84 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIOne UI 8
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classAB
Battery charge cycles1,0001,700
Endurance per cycle49 h37 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classDA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare