- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (27) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display5.8
8.4Performance6.1
6.6Camera4.0
8.4Battery3.0
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Flip7 FE
| Razr 60 Ultra | Galaxy Z Flip7 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 165.1 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,355,845+35%
- Active use (test)15.2 h vs 10.2 h+49%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 4,036+47%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 6,108+11%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Drop resistance classD vs A
- Weight199 g vs 187 g+6%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 1,700+70%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,444 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 2400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Xclipse 940 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,355,845 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 6,108 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 4,036 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | 10.2 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -26.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.84 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,700 |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | 37 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | D | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
nubia Flip 2vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE5.26.2
