- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip6
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (23) and where Galaxy Z Flip6 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display5.8
8.4Performance6.6
6.6Camera4.0
8.4Battery3.1
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraGalaxy Z Flip6
| Razr 60 Ultra | Galaxy Z Flip6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 165.1 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip6?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,400,594+31%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Active use (test)15.2 h vs 10.6 h+43%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 6,265+8%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,938 vs 4,487+32%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.39 GHz+27%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip6 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Weight199 g vs 187 g+6%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 71.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Yellow, Silver Shadow, Mint, Blue, Black, White, Peach |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,475 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.39 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,400,594 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 6,265 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | 4,487 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | 10.6 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip66.96.4
