android.gs
Compare
Razr 60 Ultra vs Find N2 Flip

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs OPPO Find N2 Flip

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (22) and where Find N2 Flip wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

22 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

OPPO · 2022Find N2 Flip

5.0Score

2 advantages≈ $530

9.6Display4.2

8.4Performance4.0

6.6Camera3.6

8.4Battery4.1

8.4Features5.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraFind N2 Flip

	Razr 60 Ultra	Find N2 Flip	Difference
Height	171.5 mm	166.2 mm	+5.3 mm
Width	74 mm	75.2 mm	−1.2 mm
Thickness	7.2 mm	7.5 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	199 g	191 g	+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Find N2 Flip?

AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 773,5742.4×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 3,2652.1×
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,600 nits2.8×
Wired charging68 W vs 44 W+55%
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Find N2 Flip: No
Wireless chargingYes · Find N2 Flip: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+9%
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
Measured brightness1,489 nits vs 1,039 nits+43%
CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%

Why is Find N2 Flip better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Weight199 g vs 191 g+4%
Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 86.4%+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1	OPPO Find N2 Flip≈ $5305.0
Design
Weight	199 g	191 g
Thickness	7.2 mm	7.5 mm
Height	171.5 mm	166.2 mm
Width	74 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP48	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass-Keramik	—
Colours	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret	Astral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold
Display
Screen size	7″	6.8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,912 px	2,520 px
Pixel density	464 ppi	403 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	1,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,489 nits	1,039 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.1%	86.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite	Mediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.32 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 830	Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score	1,831,189	773,574
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,796	3,265
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,938	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	4,300 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	15.2 h	—
Wired charging	68 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	78%	65%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.5 LUFS	-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	ColorOS 14
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	D	—