android.gs
Compare
Razr 60 Ultra vs Razr+ 2025

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr+ 2025

What Razr 60 Ultra does better (19) and where Razr+ 2025 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

19 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Motorola · 2025Razr+ 2025

7.1Score

4 advantages≈ $380

9.6Display9.1

8.4Performance6.4

6.6Camera5.7

8.4Battery3.8

8.4Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60 UltraRazr+ 2025

	Razr 60 Ultra	Razr+ 2025	Difference
Height	171.5 mm	171.4 mm	+0.1 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm	=
Thickness	7.2 mm	7.1 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	199 g	189 g	+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Razr+ 2025?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
Active use (test)15.2 h vs 10.6 h+43%
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 4,989+36%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,794,400+2%
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3 GHz+44%
Measured brightness1,489 nits vs 1,220 nits+22%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr+ 2025: No
Max video8K vs 4K

Why is Razr+ 2025 better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
Weight199 g vs 189 g+5%
Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS vs -23.8 LUFS+-7%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1	Motorola Razr+ 2025≈ $3807.1
Design
Weight	199 g	189 g
Thickness	7.2 mm	7.1 mm
Height	171.5 mm	171.4 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP48	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass-Keramik	—
Colours	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret	Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink
Display
Screen size	7″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,912 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	464 ppi	413 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,489 nits	1,220 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.1%	84.9%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.32 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 735
AnTuTu score	1,831,189	1,794,400
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,796	4,989
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,938	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	2×	2×
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	4,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	15.2 h	10.6 h
Wired charging	68 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	78%	73%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	30 W	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.5 LUFS	-23.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	Hello UI
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	D	—