android.gs
Compare
Razr 40 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip4

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

What Razr 40 Ultra does better (13) and where Galaxy Z Flip4 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra

5.0Score

13 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Samsung · 2022Galaxy Z Flip4

4.9Score

4 advantages≈ $300

6.5Display4.0

4.1Performance3.4

5.4Camera4.3

3.1Battery3.2

3.5Features7.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40 UltraGalaxy Z Flip4

	Razr 40 Ultra	Galaxy Z Flip4	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	165.2 mm	+5.6 mm
Width	74 mm	71.9 mm	+2.1 mm
Thickness	7 mm	6.9 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	184 g	187 g	−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip4?

AnTuTu score975,461 vs 685,754+42%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 3,700 mAh+3%
Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,200 nits+17%
Measured brightness1,050 nits vs 919 nits+14%
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.8+20%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip4 better than Razr 40 Ultra?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
Wireless charging power5 W vs 15 W3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,645 vs 3,913+7%
Pixel density413 ppi vs 426 ppi+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra≈ $3005.0	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4≈ $3004.9
Design
Weight	184 g	187 g
Thickness	7 mm	6.9 mm
Height	170.8 mm	165.2 mm
Width	74 mm	71.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP52	IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx8
Colours	Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz	Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	426 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	1,200 nits
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	919 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	85.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	3.19 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	975,461	685,754
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,645	3,913
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,552
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	12 MP	12 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.5	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.55"	1/1.76"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	3,800 mAh	3,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	30 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	5 W	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	-27.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1.15 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8
Major OS updates promised	3	—