How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Moto X50 Ultra vs X200

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs Vivo X200

What Moto X50 Ultra does better (6) and where X200 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Moto X50 Ultra
9.2Score
6 advantages≈ $550
vs
Vivo X200
Vivo · 2024X200
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $530
Higher score
9.5Display9.2
9.4Camera9.3
7.7Battery8.3
8.8Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto X50 UltraX200
72.4 × 161.18.674.8 × 160.38
Moto X50 UltraX200Difference
Height161.1 mm160.3 mm+0.8 mm
Width72.4 mm74.8 mm−2.4 mm
Thickness8.6 mm8 mm+0.6 mm
Weight197 g197 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto X50 Ultra better than X200?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · X200: No
  2. Wired charging125 W vs 90 W+39%
  3. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  5. USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
  6. Screen-to-body ratio92.9% vs 89.6%+4%

Why is X200 better than Moto X50 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+29%
  2. Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 4,500 nits+80%
  3. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+21%
  4. eSIMNo · Moto X50 Ultra: Yes
  5. Pixel density444 ppi vs 460 ppi+4%
  6. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  7. Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
  8. Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,260 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200Vivo X200≈ $5309.5
Design
Weight197 g197 g
Thickness8.6 mm8 mm
Height161.1 mm160.3 mm
Width72.4 mm74.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusSchott Xensation Alpha
ColoursForest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach FuzzNatural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelP-OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,220 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,712 px2,800 px
Pixel density444 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,500 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,563 nits
Screen-to-body ratio92.9%89.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score—2,632,874
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,014
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,334
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh5,800 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging125 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—78%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 Gen2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.12
Video outputYesYes
Ultra WidebandYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare