- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G52 vs Poco M4 Pro 5G
Motorola Moto G52 vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
What Moto G52 does better (7) and where Poco M4 Pro 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.8
3.4Performance3.4
6.6Camera6.6
5.5Battery6.0
4.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G52Poco M4 Pro 5G
| Moto G52 | Poco M4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.6 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 195 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G52 better than Poco M4 Pro 5G?
- AnTuTu score429,690 vs 296,721+45%
- OLED panelYes · Poco M4 Pro 5G: No
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 450 nits+56%
- Measured brightness643 nits vs 510 nits+26%
- Weight169 g vs 195 g+15%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.8 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 84.8%+2%
Why is Poco M4 Pro 5G better than Moto G52?
- 5GNo · Moto G52: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,469 vs 1,797+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 169 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 643 nits | 510 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 429,690 | 296,721 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,469 | 1,797 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 51% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
