- android.gs
- Compare
- nova 9 SE vs Moto G52
Huawei nova 9 SE vs Motorola Moto G52
What nova 9 SE does better (8) and where Moto G52 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova 9 SEMoto G52
| nova 9 SE | Moto G52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 160.1 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 74.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 169 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova 9 SE better than Moto G52?
- Wired charging66 W vs 30 W2.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min112% vs 50%2.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 86.9%+3%
Why is Moto G52 better than nova 9 SE?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- OLED panelNo · nova 9 SE: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · nova 9 SE: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · nova 9 SE: Yes
- Weight191 g vs 169 g+13%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 402 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 169 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Pearl White, Crystal Blue | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 643 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 86.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,690 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,469 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 12 | — |









