- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G52 vs Redmi Note 11
Motorola Moto G52 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
What Moto G52 does better (6) and where Redmi Note 11 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.1
3.4Performance2.9
6.6Camera6.2
5.5Battery6.0
4.6Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G52Redmi Note 11
| Moto G52 | Redmi Note 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 159.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 73.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 179 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G52 better than Redmi Note 11?
- AnTuTu score429,690 vs 228,044+88%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight169 g vs 179 g+6%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.4″+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 84.5%+3%
Why is Redmi Note 11 better than Moto G52?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,469 vs 1,662+13%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,000 nits+43%
- Measured brightness643 nits vs 736 nits+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 169 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 643 nits | 736 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 429,690 | 228,044 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,469 | 1,662 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
