- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G200 5G vs Redmi K40S
Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What Moto G200 5G does better (7) and where Redmi K40S wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.9
7.6Camera8.0
6.0Battery5.5
6.3Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G200 5GRedmi K40S
| Moto G200 5G | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.1 mm | 163.2 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 195 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G200 5G better than Redmi K40S?
- Main camera108 MP vs 48 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Redmi K40S better than Moto G200 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- CPU frequency2.99 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- Weight202 g vs 195 g+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 168.1 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 558 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 86.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,346 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,319 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
