- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G200 5G vs Moto G30
Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Motorola Moto G30
What Moto G200 5G does better (23) and where Moto G30 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display3.8
6.0Performance2.2
7.6Camera6.7
6.0Battery5.0
6.3Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G200 5GMoto G30
| Moto G200 5G | Moto G30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.1 mm | 165.2 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 200 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G200 5G better than Moto G30?
- AnTuTu score682,346 vs 170,9684×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,319 vs 1,2652.6×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wired charging33 W vs 20 W+65%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GYes · Moto G30: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- CPU frequency2.99 GHz vs 2 GHz+50%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 269 ppi+47%
- Process5 nm vs 11 nm2.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is Moto G30 better than Moto G200 5G?
- Memory card slotNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 168.1 mm | 165.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Phantom Black (Dark Pearl), Pastel Sky |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 558 nits | 468 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 82.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 11 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,346 | 170,968 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,319 | 1,265 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 20 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 32% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.11 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
