- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G200 5G vs Camon 19 Pro 5G
Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
What Moto G200 5G does better (9) and where Camon 19 Pro 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.3
7.6Camera7.7
6.0Battery6.0
6.3Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G200 5GCamon 19 Pro 5G
| Moto G200 5G | Camon 19 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.1 mm | 166.7 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G200 5G better than Camon 19 Pro 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.99 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 19 Pro 5G: No
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 4+62%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Camon 19 Pro 5G better than Moto G200 5G?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 88.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 168.1 mm | 166.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Eco Black, Cedar Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 558 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 88.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,346 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,319 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
