- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G200 5G vs Galaxy M53
Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What Moto G200 5G does better (9) and where Galaxy M53 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display6.8
6.0Performance5.4
7.6Camera7.6
6.0Battery5.3
6.3Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G200 5GGalaxy M53
| Moto G200 5G | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.1 mm | 164.7 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 176 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G200 5G better than Galaxy M53?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,319 vs 2,449+36%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.99 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.7 LUFS vs -29.3 LUFS+-9%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than Moto G200 5G?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Measured brightness558 nits vs 802 nits+44%
- Memory card slotNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Weight202 g vs 176 g+15%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.4 mm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 168.1 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 558 nits | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 85.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,346 | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,319 | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5.1 |
