- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 22 4G vs Camon 40
Meizu Note 22 4G vs Tecno Camon 40
What Note 22 4G does better (6) and where Camon 40 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display8.4
7.8Camera8.2
6.4Battery7.9
6.4Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 22 4GCamon 40
| Note 22 4G | Camon 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 164.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.3 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 177 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 22 4G better than Camon 40?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,300 nits+38%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Camon 40 better than Note 22 4G?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 22 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Memory card slotNo · Note 22 4G: Yes
- Weight204 g vs 177 g+15%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.3 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | — | Panda King Glass |
| Colours | Eclipse Black, Titanium Lux, Steel Blue, Graphite Mist | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.1% | 89.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 575,113 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
