- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraForce Pro 3 vs Redmi K60 Pro
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
What DuraForce Pro 3 does better (6) and where Redmi K60 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display8.6
6.3Camera9.1
3.1Battery8.2
9.6Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraForce Pro 3Redmi K60 Pro
| DuraForce Pro 3 | Redmi K60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154 mm | 162.8 mm | −8.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 8.6 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 237 g | 201 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraForce Pro 3 better than Redmi K60 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 54 MP+19%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K60 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Redmi K60 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K60 Pro: No
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi K60 Pro better than DuraForce Pro 3?
- RAM6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
- Battery capacity4,270 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+17%
- 4K video frame rate24 fps vs 60 fps2.5×
- Wireless charging power8 W vs 30 W3.8×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Screen size5.4″ vs 6.7″+24%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Dual SIMNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 237 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 154 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Shatter-Resistant Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 64.7% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,710,757 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,979 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,624 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 54 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 24 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,270 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 158% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
