- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi K40 Pro vs Redmi K60 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
What Redmi K40 Pro does better (4) and where Redmi K60 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.6
8.2Camera9.1
4.2Battery8.2
7.0Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K40 ProRedmi K60 Pro
| Redmi K40 Pro | Redmi K60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 162.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 201 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K40 Pro better than Redmi K60 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 54 MP+19%
- Weight196 g vs 201 g+3%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+10%
Why is Redmi K60 Pro better than Redmi K40 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 120 W3.6×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Redmi K40 Pro: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Redmi K40 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,520 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 158%2.7×
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 526 ppi+33%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+13%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,400 nits+8%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Aurora | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,710,757 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,979 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,624 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 54 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,520 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 158% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 12 | MIUI 14 |
