- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero X Pro vs Galaxy M32
Infinix Zero X Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M32
What Zero X Pro does better (17) and where Galaxy M32 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.9
3.0Performance2.5
9.7Camera7.1
4.9Battery5.3
2.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero X ProGalaxy M32
| Zero X Pro | Galaxy M32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 159.3 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 180 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero X Pro better than Galaxy M32?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy M32: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy M32: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,674 vs 1,205+39%
- AnTuTu score313,652 vs 280,002+12%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 30%2.7×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Galaxy M32: No
Why is Galaxy M32 better than Zero X Pro?
- NFCNo · Zero X Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Measured brightness515 nits vs 713 nits+38%
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 800 nits+14%
- Weight193 g vs 180 g+7%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 411 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Black, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 515 nits | 713 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 313,652 | 280,002 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,674 | 1,205 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 171 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.56 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | One UI 5 |
