- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M32 vs Galaxy M53
Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What Galaxy M32 does better (3) and where Galaxy M53 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display6.8
2.5Performance5.4
7.1Camera7.6
5.3Battery5.3
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M32Galaxy M53
| Galaxy M32 | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.3 mm | 164.7 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 176 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M32 better than Galaxy M53?
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 400 nits2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M53: No
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 394 ppi+4%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than Galaxy M32?
- AnTuTu score280,002 vs 680,6282.4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,205 vs 2,4492×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme171 vs 6093.6×
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Galaxy M32: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Galaxy M32: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 159.3 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Light Blue | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 713 nits | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 280,002 | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,205 | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 171 | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.56 W/kg | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | One UI 5.1 |
