- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero X Pro vs A95 5G
Infinix Zero X Pro vs OPPO A95 5G
What Zero X Pro does better (11) and where A95 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.0
9.7Camera6.5
4.9Battery3.2
2.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero X ProA95 5G
| Zero X Pro | A95 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 160.1 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 73.4 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 193 g | 173 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero X Pro better than A95 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 48 MP2.2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 30 W+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · A95 5G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · A95 5G: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+4%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · A95 5G: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 62%+29%
Why is A95 5G better than Zero X Pro?
- NFCNo · Zero X Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+17%
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 800 nits+14%
- Weight193 g vs 173 g+12%
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 160.1 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 515 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Mediatek Dimensity 800U |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | 313,652 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,674 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,310 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | ColorOS 11.1 |
