android.gs
Compare
Zero Flip vs Razr 60 Ultra

Infinix Zero Flip vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

What Zero Flip does better (4) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2024Zero Flip

6.1Score

4 advantages≈ $630

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

16 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

4.5Display9.6

5.6Camera6.6

6.1Battery8.4

3.4Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Zero FlipRazr 60 Ultra

	Zero Flip	Razr 60 Ultra	Difference
Height	170.4 mm	171.5 mm	−1.1 mm
Width	73.4 mm	74 mm	−0.6 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.2 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	195 g	199 g	−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Zero Flip better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Wired charging70 W vs 68 W+3%
Weight195 g vs 199 g+2%
Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -25.5 LUFS+-4%
Screen-to-body ratio86.1% vs 84.1%+2%

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Zero Flip?

RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits3.2×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Active use (test)11 h vs 15.2 h+38%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+66%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Pixel density413 ppi vs 464 ppi+12%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Zero Flip≈ $6306.1	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1
Design
Weight	195 g	199 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.2 mm
Height	170.4 mm	171.5 mm
Width	73.4 mm	74 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	—	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass-Keramik
Colours	Rock Black, Blossom Glow	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
Display
Screen size	6.9″	7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	464 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.1%	84.1%
HDR	—	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8020	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	1,831,189
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,796
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,938
Memory
RAM	8 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,720 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11 h	15.2 h
Wired charging	70 W	68 W
Charged in 30 min	—	78%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	—	2
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.6 LUFS	-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 14.5	Hello UI
Major OS updates promised	2	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	49 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	D