- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 40 vs Galaxy F54
Infinix Zero 40 vs Samsung Galaxy F54
What Zero 40 does better (12) and where Galaxy F54 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display8.2
9.3Camera8.8
7.4Battery8.4
5.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 40Galaxy F54
| Zero 40 | Galaxy F54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.3 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 40 better than Galaxy F54?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy F54: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+29%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Weight195 g vs 199 g+2%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 85%+5%
Why is Galaxy F54 better than Zero 40?
- Major OS updates promised2 vs 42×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotNo · Zero 40: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Rock Black, Violet Garden, Moving Titanium | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 85% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,315,468 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,932 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 72% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | One UI 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 4 |
