- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 40 vs Camon 30 Pro
Infinix Zero 40 vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Zero 40 does better (7) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display9.5
7.8Performance7.4
9.3Camera9.1
7.4Battery7.2
5.7Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 40Camon 30 Pro
| Zero 40 | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 74.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 40 better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score1,315,468 vs 949,357+39%
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Charged in 30 min72% vs 64%+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Zero 40?
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Rock Black, Violet Garden, Moving Titanium | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,315,468 | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,932 | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 72% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 2 |
